xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: constify sysfs_ops structures

To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: constify sysfs_ops structures
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:49:10 -0400
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1444560146-22737-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>
References: <1444560146-22737-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 12:42:26PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> These sysfs_ops structures are never modified.  All other sysfs_ops
> structures in the kernel are declared as const.
> 
> Done with the help of Coccinelle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>
> 

The fix looks correct, but these data structures just happened to be
removed and condensed into a more generic xfs_sysfs_ops definition as
part of the recent per-mount stats series. See commit a27c2640 ("xfs:
consolidate sysfs ops") for reference.

Brian

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c
> index aa03670..192c865 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ xfs_dbg_store(
>       return xfs_attr->store ? xfs_attr->store(buf, count, NULL) : 0;
>  }
>  
> -static struct sysfs_ops xfs_dbg_ops = {
> +static const struct sysfs_ops xfs_dbg_ops = {
>       .show = xfs_dbg_show,
>       .store = xfs_dbg_store,
>  };
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ xfs_log_store(
>       return xfs_attr->store ? xfs_attr->store(buf, count, log) : 0;
>  }
>  
> -static struct sysfs_ops xfs_log_ops = {
> +static const struct sysfs_ops xfs_log_ops = {
>       .show = xfs_log_show,
>       .store = xfs_log_store,
>  };
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>