| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 0/7 v8] xfs: stats in sysfs |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:01:55 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5609561C.5040508@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1443223380-18870-1-git-send-email-billodo@xxxxxxxxxx> <5609561C.5040508@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 |
oops, lost a line, should have been: On 9/28/15 10:00 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Or for a more concrete example, in patch 5 you do: > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) > - val += *(((__u32 *)&per_cpu(xfsstats, cpu) + idx)); > + val += *(((__u32 *)&per_cpu(*stats, cpu) + idx)); > return val; > > and then in patch 6 you do: > > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) > - val += *(((__u32 *)&per_cpu(*stats, cpu) + idx)); > + val += *(((__u32 *)per_cpu_ptr(stats, cpu) + idx)); > > return val; > > But this is unrelated to the purpose of patch 6; it should just be fixed > up in a modified patch 5, i.e. > > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) > - val += *(((__u32 *)&per_cpu(xfsstats, cpu) + idx)); > + val += *(((__u32 *)per_cpu_ptr(stats, cpu) + idx)); > return val; |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/7 v8] xfs: stats in sysfs, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/7 v8] xfs: stats in sysfs, Bill O'Donnell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/7 v8] xfs: stats in sysfs, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/7 v8] xfs: stats in sysfs, Bill O'Donnell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |