On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:01:45AM -0500, Troy McCorkell wrote:
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx is an open list and does not require people to be members
> of the list to post to it. The spam filters applied to
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx are
> as aggressive as they can be and still allow for an open list.
>
> Next option would be to add a moderator to the list. Adding a moderator
> would interfere with non-list members posting to the list.
Moderation is not an option because of this interference and the
burden it puts on the moderator to respond in a timely fashion.
If the spam rejection does not improve our next option is to move to
the linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx list - the vger infrastructure is not
perfect, but it does have better spam rejection than the current
filtering on this list. This may be the best long-term solution to
the problem, but it does involve short term pain for everyone.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|