Re: XFS FAQ - out of date?

xfs

Re: XFS FAQ - out of date?

To:	Fanael Linithien <fanael4@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: XFS FAQ - out of date?
From:	Viktor Trojanovic <viktor@xxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:31:49 +0200
Cc:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<CA+o=1OUpgK6w2W9Y8JHeN7ByopEuzEx1u87FhBPTcmZRSA0Bdg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<55FA0B1D.8000905@xxxxxxxx> <CA+o=1OUpgK6w2W9Y8JHeN7ByopEuzEx1u87FhBPTcmZRSA0Bdg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0

On 17.09.2015 06:06, Fanael Linithien wrote:

2015-09-17 2:36 GMT+02:00 Viktor Trojanovic <viktor@xxxxxxxx>:

I later found (very few) sources that confirmed that Grub is not compatible
with the current XFS level 5, that SuSE created a patch for the problem but
it wasn't adopted upstream.

It is merged upstream[1], but last GRUB release was 2.02 beta 2, which
is almost two years old. If you have no qualms about using grub-git
from AUR, there will be no problems with XFS, even with v5 superblock.

[1] 
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/grub-core/fs/xfs.c?id=b6e80c7778b708c1632d957d00507aad60d9e255


Great, I'll try that. Thanks for replying.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
XFS FAQ - out of date?, Viktor Trojanovic Re: XFS FAQ - out of date?, Carlos E. R. Re: XFS FAQ - out of date?, Gim Leong Chin Re: XFS FAQ - out of date?, Fanael Linithien Re: XFS FAQ - out of date?, Viktor Trojanovic <=

Previous by Date:	Re: easily reproducible filesystem crash on rebuilding array, Emmanuel Florac
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] xfs: add missing ilock around dio write last extent alignment, Brian Foster
Previous by Thread:	Re: XFS FAQ - out of date?, Fanael Linithien
Next by Thread:	Re: easily reproducible filesystem crash on rebuilding array, Emmanuel Florac
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]