xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] cancel the setfilesize transation when io error happen

To: Zhaohongjiang <zhaohongjiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cancel the setfilesize transation when io error happen
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:42:45 -0400
Cc: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <55F0DF7A.7050404@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <55F0DF7A.7050404@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 09:40:10AM +0800, Zhaohongjiang wrote:
> When I ran xfstest/073 case, the remount process was blocked to wait
> transactions to be zero. I found there was a io error happened, and the
> setfilesize transaction was not released properly. We should add the
> changes to cancel the io error in this case.
> 

Thanks for the patch. Was the io error by chance or part of the test? I
ask because it would be good to have test coverage for this if we don't
currently.

> Reproduction steps:
> 1. dd if=/dev/zero of=xfs1.img bs=1M count=2048
> 2. mkfs.xfs xfs1.img
> 3. losetup -f ./xfs1.img /dev/loop0
> 4. mount -t xfs /dev/loop0 /home/test_dir/
> 5. mkdir /home/test_dir/test
> 6. mkfs.xfs -dfile,name=image,size=2g
> 7. mount -t xfs -o loop image /home/test_dir/test
> 8. cp a file bigger than 2g to /home/test_dir/test
> 9. mount -t xfs -o remount,ro /home/test_dir/test
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Hongjiang <zhaohongjiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> index 50ab287..fab55da 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> @@ -212,8 +212,21 @@ xfs_end_io(
>               ioend->io_error = -EIO;
>               goto done;
>       }
> -     if (ioend->io_error)
> +     if (ioend->io_error) {
> +             /*
> +              * We should cancel the setfilesize transation when io error
> +              * happen.
> +              */
> +             if (ioend->io_append_trans) {
> +                     
> current_set_flags_nested(&ioend->io_append_trans->t_pflags,
> +                                                             PF_FSTRANS);
> +                     rwsem_acquire_read(&VFS_I(XFS_I(ioend->io_inode))->i_sb
> +                             ->s_writers.lock_map[SB_FREEZE_FS-1], 0, 1, 
> _THIS_IP_);
> +                     xfs_trans_cancel(ioend->io_append_trans);               
>         

Trailing whitespace on the line above.

That aside, I wonder if it would be cleaner to put this stuff in a
helper similar to xfs_setfilesize_ioend(). In fact, we could probably
just update xfs_setfilesize_ioend() to check ioend->io_error after
fixing up the task flags and whatnot and cancel the transaction instead
of calling xfs_setfilesize(). Then, call it here also and update the new
comment to point out that it cancels the transaction on error. Thoughts?

Brian

> +             }
> +
>               goto done;
> +     }
> 
>       /*
>        * For unwritten extents we need to issue transactions to convert a
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> -- 
> version="9"
> logging="no"
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>