On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 02:15:01PM -0500, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 01:39:53PM -0500, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 01:32:25PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > > On 9/3/15 12:57 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 11:36:26AM -0500, billodo wrote:
> > > >> As a part of the work to move xfs global stats from procfs to sysfs,
> > > >> this patch creates the symlink from proc/fs/xfs/stat to
> > > >> sys/fs/xfs/stats.
> > > >>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >> ---
> > > >> fs/xfs/xfs_stats.c | 8 ++++++--
> > > >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >>
> > > >> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_stats.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_stats.c
> > > >> index 856cf57..ad435f1 100644
> > > >> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_stats.c
> > > >> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_stats.c
> > > >> @@ -244,9 +244,13 @@ xfs_init_procfs(void)
> > > >> if (!proc_mkdir("fs/xfs", NULL))
> > > >> goto out;
> > > >>
> > > >> - if (!proc_create("fs/xfs/stat", 0, NULL,
> > > >> - &xfs_stat_proc_fops))
> > > >> + if (!proc_symlink("fs/xfs/stat", NULL,
> > > >> + "/sys/fs/xfs/stats/stats"))
> > > >
> > > > Uh.... is it actually guaranteed that sysfs is mounted on /sys now?
> > > >
> > > > I sort of recall gregkh grumbling years ago that sysfs can be mounted
> > > > anywhere,
> > > > and that /proc shouldn't hardcode links to it. But that's just
> > > > handwaving on
> > > > my part.
> > >
> > > You can blame me for that idea. At least one other driver does
> > > do it, though; of_core_init():
> > >
> > > proc_symlink("device-tree", NULL, "/sys/firmware/devicetree/base");
> > >
> > > worst-case scenario, your "legacy" stats file will be a broken symlink...
> > >
> > > -Eric
> > >
> >
> > I'm still looking for something in documentation that dictates such a
> > requirement
> > regarding symlinks to sysfs elements.
> > -Bill
>
> I did find this in: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/sysfs-rules.txt
> --------------snip--------------------------
> - sysfs is always at /sys
> Parsing /proc/mounts is a waste of time. Other mount points are a
> system configuration bug you should not try to solve. For test cases,
> possibly support a SYSFS_PATH environment variable to overwrite the
> application's behavior, but never try to search for sysfs. Never try
> to mount it, if you are not an early boot script.
> -------------snip---------------------------
Ah, ok, sorry for the noise then.
--D
> >
> > > > --D
> > > >
> > > >> + {
> > > >> + printk(KERN_INFO "failed to created fs/xfs/stat
> > > >> symlink\n");
> > > >> goto out_remove_xfs_dir;
> > > >> + }
> > > >> +
> > > >> #ifdef CONFIG_XFS_QUOTA
> > > >> if (!proc_create("fs/xfs/xqmstat", 0, NULL,
> > > >> &xqmstat_proc_fops))
> > > >> --
> > > >> 2.4.3
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > xfs mailing list
> > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
|