xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Performance impact of mkfs.xfs vs mkfs.xfs -f

To: Shrinand Javadekar <shrinand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Performance impact of mkfs.xfs vs mkfs.xfs -f
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:04:51 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CABppvi7AYbqiskyrEp3As6RPyRz0pThoqVEcjX4736KV-wLkCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CABppvi6GdaTQgqpYJi6RhkpjP9ydTV8-2VV8LF9tHSN63XzWtA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55DCE1CF.5030708@xxxxxxxxxxx> <CABppvi6W5_1GBrb8x1wOAq3X6yraTtt1UYEFE+dBzcXj3yTzrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150825234300.GN714@dastard> <CABppvi7AYbqiskyrEp3As6RPyRz0pThoqVEcjX4736KV-wLkCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 8/26/15 12:48 PM, Shrinand Javadekar wrote:
>>>>> >> >> Any ideas why this might be happening?
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > With the paucity of information you've provided, nope!
>>> >>
>>> >> Apologies. What more information can I provide?
>> >
>> > http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_information_should_I_include_when_reporting_a_problem.3F
> [Shri] I mentioned this in my first email. Here's the information:
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2015-06/msg00108.html

Just as an aside:

A 3 month old email under a different subject doesn't really help
us in this thread.  ;)

You're the only one who knows if this is the same machine, whether you've
upgraded since, etc.  So we had to ask...

For anyone reading: 

If you're having a problem, please, please always start with as much information
about your environment as you can provide, as described in the xfs.org URL
above.  It saves many email round-trips, and helps us help you better.

Thanks,
-Eric

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>