Re: generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1

To:	Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression]
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:34:42 -0400
Cc:	Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Yea/bf77SErWZU8QQeC1Z4C2MGuJWtnYpqTetUzS1z4=; b=WlGORt6m/JEB470lpEBtMZf5eaDH7Yech3LhoQxaukkIZb9f8jGd8YA5PpqvtQsz/Y 5c2qHMSDBeCbj4al/8Hufq2A5veO6MarPL4yiOyjiBBXU4SDldnaYsZug6h3eF8TsaUr L6f1xnnvHganI9eUD27rtVz/W2Uo/i1TUKjanYulUtrNBNk7W4w56FkxwTTi00BwNj+6 gZm/d1Iq0WGKsNWTla0mekRy+0OeFHoilx/MUg0VFFJxCunf8e576Bnwti6WGA+fnKjB 6ziXBeDLNBBuViM6i3plBy1ETxotKFMFhxg434LBWqRamEhSKNnbRTC4v8XYEYduG7+A ftxA==
In-reply-to:	<20150813004435.GN3902@dastard>
References:	<20150812101204.GE17933@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150813004435.GN3902@dastard>
Sender:	Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:44:35AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> It might be a couple of days before I really get a chance to dig
> into this, so it might be best if Tejun can look into it first.

Yeap, have been looking into it since yesterday.  I have some
suspicions.  I'll write once I know more.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code, Eryu Guan Re: generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code, Eryu Guan Re: generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression], Dave Chinner Re: generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression], Tejun Heo <= Re: generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression], Tejun Heo [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME inodes, Tejun Heo Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME inodes, Jan Kara Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME inodes, Damien Wyart Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME inodes, Tejun Heo Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME inodes, Damien Wyart Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME inodes, Tejun Heo Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME inodes, Jan Kara Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME inodes, Tejun Heo Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME inodes, Tejun Heo

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:	[PATCH][RFC] xfs_copy: don't use DIRECT IO to copy 4k sector device, Zorro Lang
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH][RFC] xfs_copy: don't use DIRECT IO to copy 4k sector device, Eric Sandeen
Previous by Thread:	Re: generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression], Dave Chinner
Next by Thread:	Re: generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression], Tejun Heo
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Previous by Date:

[PATCH][RFC] xfs_copy: don't use DIRECT IO to copy 4k sector device, Zorro Lang

Next by Date:

Re: [PATCH][RFC] xfs_copy: don't use DIRECT IO to copy 4k sector device, Eric Sandeen

Previous by Thread:

Re: generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression], Dave Chinner

Next by Thread:

Re: generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression], Tejun Heo

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]