| To: | "L.A. Walsh" <xfs@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: why crc req on free-inobt & file-type-indir options? |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 9 Aug 2015 10:11:28 +1000 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <55C5709F.8030705@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <55C41D75.4040504@xxxxxxxxx> <55C43B70.4050300@xxxxxxxxxxx> <55C468F0.2040707@xxxxxxxxx> <20150807225531.GG3902@dastard> <55C55265.4080309@xxxxxxxxx> <620A4212-818A-4375-90FC-DBB0B91A84DB@xxxxxxxxxxx> <55C5709F.8030705@xxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 07:59:43PM -0700, L.A. Walsh wrote: > > > Eric Sandeen wrote: > > > >>On Aug 7, 2015, at 5:50 PM, L.A. Walsh <xfs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>Q: should the versions of xfsdump&restore be the same as the rest of the > >>xfsprogs? > >Nope, they are separate packages with separate versioning. > --- > I see. So how does one tell which version of xfsdump/restore should > be used to "safely" dump (and restore) a file system made > with version i.j.k of xfsprogs(mkfs.xfs) ? Or is that possible? xfsdump does not care what version of the XFS filesystem it operates on as it does not access the raw on-disk srtuctures. i.e. xfsdump/restore are just like any other userspace application that uses standard syscalls and ioctls to read/write information to/from the filesystem. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] fs: create and use seq_show_option for escaping, Kees Cook |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 01/11] xfs: disentagle EFI release from the extent count, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: why crc req on free-inobt & file-type-indir options?, L.A. Walsh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: why crc req on free-inobt & file-type-indir options?, L.A. Walsh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |