| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: why crc req on free-inobt & file-type-indir options? |
| From: | "L.A. Walsh" <xfs@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 07 Aug 2015 19:59:43 -0700 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <620A4212-818A-4375-90FC-DBB0B91A84DB@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <55C41D75.4040504@xxxxxxxxx> <55C43B70.4050300@xxxxxxxxxxx> <55C468F0.2040707@xxxxxxxxx> <20150807225531.GG3902@dastard> <55C55265.4080309@xxxxxxxxx> <620A4212-818A-4375-90FC-DBB0B91A84DB@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird |
Eric Sandeen wrote: On Aug 7, 2015, at 5:50 PM, L.A. Walsh <xfs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Q: should the versions of xfsdump&restore be the same as the rest of the xfsprogs?Nope, they are separate packages with separate versioning. --- I see. So how does one tell which version of xfsdump/restore should be used to "safely" dump (and restore) a file system made with version i.j.k of xfsprogs(mkfs.xfs) ? Or is that possible? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: why crc req on free-inobt & file-type-indir options?, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] fs: create and use seq_show_option for escaping, J. R. Okajima |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: why crc req on free-inobt & file-type-indir options?, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: why crc req on free-inobt & file-type-indir options?, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |