On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 08:09:34AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:41:00AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 01:44:24PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
> > > index 42c9b05..aceb54f 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
> > > @@ -61,9 +61,15 @@ __xfs_efi_release(
> > >
> > > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&efip->efi_refcount)) {
> > > spin_lock(&ailp->xa_lock);
> > > - /* xfs_trans_ail_delete() drops the AIL lock. */
> > > - xfs_trans_ail_delete(ailp, &efip->efi_item,
> > > - SHUTDOWN_LOG_IO_ERROR);
> > > + /*
> > > + * We don't know whether the EFI made it to the AIL. Remove it
> > > + * if so. Note that xfs_trans_ail_delete() drops the AIL lock.
> > > + */
> > > + if (efip->efi_item.li_flags & XFS_LI_IN_AIL)
> > > + xfs_trans_ail_delete(ailp, &efip->efi_item,
> > > + SHUTDOWN_LOG_IO_ERROR);
> > > + else
> > > + spin_unlock(&ailp->xa_lock);
> > > xfs_efi_item_free(efip);
> > > }
> >
> > We now have a lot of this pattern:
> >
> > spin_lock(&ailp->xa_lock);
> > if (lip->li_flags & XFS_LI_IN_AIL)
> > xfs_trans_ail_delete(ailp, lip, shutdown_reason);
> > else
> > spin_unlock(&ailp->xa_lock);
> >
> > occurring in the code. Can you look into adding a helper function
> > for this, say xfs_trans_ail_remove()? (separate patch, of course!)
> >
>
> There was only one other instance of this with regard to the EFI that is
> ultimately replaced with an xfs_efi_release() call. I'll look into
> whether there's enough instances of this for other items to justify a
> helper.
A quick look shows at least another 4 outside the EFI code:
xfs_buf_item_unlock
xfs_qm_dqflush_done
xfs_qm_dqflush
xfs_iflush_abort
That's enough for a helper, I think.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|