xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v3] xfsprogs: blkid is now mandatory

To: Jan Tulak <jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xfsprogs: blkid is now mandatory
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 10:20:05 -0700
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1326157887.2004059.1438598404429.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1156743222.24471614.1436281858017.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <1436346893-11831-1-git-send-email-jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx> <1508777144.956841.1437482376774.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <20150726162530.GE29329@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1326157887.2004059.1438598404429.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
On 8/3/15 3:40 AM, Jan Tulak wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 08:39:36AM -0400, Jan Tulak wrote:
>>> I just found that while it is possible to get blkid on OS X, it is
>>> in 1.0.0 version which doesn't have blkid_probe_get function.
>>> I'm examining whether it is possible to get an updated version there,
>>> but right now, this patch breaks OS X support. Unfortunately I didn't
>>> noticed of this before, as the OS X port was terribly out of date.
>>>
>>> So this patch shouldn't be included until I find how to get around.
>>
>> I don't think this is a lbocker given that OSX support doesn't
>> even work.
>>
>> To the contrary I'd really prefer to go in ASAP to avoid anyone
>> relying on it longer than nessecary.
> 
> I tried to get newer blkid on OSX, but so far without a big success 
> (well, it looks like a kind of a small dependency hell that would 
> have to be ported, with bigger or smaller effort...). With regards 
> on the priorities, I think if we can make the OS X support in 
> "manual patching required" way, then? 
> 
> So lets include this patch, and just note it OS X doc "you have to revert
> commit XXX and re-apply any changes to the relevant code"?

IIRC block device signature detection isn't really required, it's just
a nice-to-have; perhaps if blkid isn't present, that functionality can
simply be disabled?

-Eric

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>