xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v3] xfsprogs: blkid is now mandatory

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xfsprogs: blkid is now mandatory
From: Jan Tulak <jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:39:36 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1436346893-11831-1-git-send-email-jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1156743222.24471614.1436281858017.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <1436346893-11831-1-git-send-email-jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: geD/PXeMdTV/4dfSfsvvlVDSpE4NBw==
Thread-topic: xfsprogs: blkid is now mandatory

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jan Tulak" <jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH v3] xfsprogs: blkid is now mandatory
> 
> Because blkid is here for a long time, I hereby propose a patch for
> removing support for NOT having blkid. The current support through
> set of #ifdef is prone to errors like
> making a patch just in one of the branches, and according to a
> recent talk between Christoph and Eric, it is not necessary to keep
> it supported.
> 
> Remove code for checking ENABLE_BLKID, and the code when
> ENABLE_BLKID is not defined.  The only use of libdisk was in the
> removed code, so remove libdisk too.  It makes blkid required for
> compilation.
> 

I just found that while it is possible to get blkid on OS X, it is
in 1.0.0 version which doesn't have blkid_probe_get function.
I'm examining whether it is possible to get an updated version there,
but right now, this patch breaks OS X support. Unfortunately I didn't
noticed of this before, as the OS X port was terribly out of date.

So this patch shouldn't be included until I find how to get around.

Cheers,
Jan

-- 
Jan Tulak
jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>