xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Q: xfs_db: invalid numrecs (*) in bmapbtd block

To: Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Q: xfs_db: invalid numrecs (*) in bmapbtd block
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:24:49 +1000
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAGqmi75jFGjWvFFT5HTwyO1tv4-d4J=aVJ83L2zqNyWMDOz1RQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CAGqmi75jFGjWvFFT5HTwyO1tv4-d4J=aVJ83L2zqNyWMDOz1RQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:44:20PM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote:
> Good time of day list,
> i do regular check fragmentation on my servers and xfs_db show strange erros:
> 
> # xfs_db -c frag -r /dev/sdc1
> invalid numrecs (51914) in bmapbtd block

That's expected behaviour if you are running that on a mounted
filesystem. I'm assuming this is the case because you are telling
xfs_db to run in read only mode...

Why? Because an actively modified filesystem is only coherent on
disk when you consider all the modifications staged in the journal,
and xfs_db ignores the journal. Hence what it reads of disk is not
coherent and hence is not guaranteed valid.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>