xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] mkfs.xfs: always use underlying fs sector size when mkfs'ing

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mkfs.xfs: always use underlying fs sector size when mkfs'ing a file
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:24:42 -0500
Cc: Jan Tulak <jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20150619152159.GA3939@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <55820229.1010701@xxxxxxxxxx> <14667996.16447259.1434625419793.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <20150619150904.GB22842@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55843276.5020804@xxxxxxxxxx> <20150619152159.GA3939@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 6/19/15 10:21 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:17:10AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> though we also claim to nominally support building on osx, irix, etc,
>> which doesn't have that library, right?
> 
> Debian supports it for kfreebsd and hurd, and
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/15546 suggest an older version did
> build on OS X.  So I don't think it's a real problem even if IRIX
> might require some minor porting efforts.
> 

Ok.  And honestly, building xfsprogs on OSX seems like nothing
more than a curiosity ...

-Eric

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>