xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to cddc116

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to cddc116
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 08:06:16 -0400
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20150529223105.GC24666@dastard>
References: <20150528215309.GA15721@dastard> <20150528222109.GC4316@dastard> <20150529120549.GA36053@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150529223105.GC24666@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 08:31:05AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:05:49AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:21:09AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 07:53:09AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > > 
> > > > The for-next branch of the xfs kernel repository at
> > > > 
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git
> > > > 
> > > > has just been updated.
> > > > 
> > > > The new head of the for-next branch is commit:
> > > > 
> > > > cddc116 xfs: xfs_iozero can return positive errno
> > > 
> > > Note: i just updated it again with a patch I missed in the
> > > xfs-for-linus-v4.1-rc6 branch:
> > > 
> > > Brian Foster (1):
> > >       [22419ac] xfs: fix broken i_nlink accounting for whiteout tmpfile 
> > > inode
> > > 
> > 
> > Any word on the following two as well?
> > 
> > http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2015-April/041504.html
> > http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2015-May/041582.html
> 
> I've got them queued up for the 4.2 cycle (haven't pushed the branch
> yet) because I didn't think they were really critical.
> 

Sounds good, just making sure they weren't lost. Thanks!

Brian

> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>