| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Proposal/RFC: new metadata-specific UUID for V5 supers |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:06:46 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20150428012003.GS15810@dastard> |
| References: | <553EB3D1.10602@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20150427233754.GT21261@dastard> <553ED9D8.4050106@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20150428012003.GS15810@dastard> |
On 4/27/15 8:20 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > I think that labels are a far better way of dealing with this > problem. Get rid of the UUID mount checking (and hence the nouuid > mount option), and tell people to use by-label instead of by-uuid to > identify their filesystems when doing clones and snapshots. Labels > make it much easier for humans to identify the filesystem than > UUIDs... I suppose so. Withdrawn. ;) -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Proposal/RFC: new metadata-specific UUID for V5 supers, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Paper Cone Special for Cotton Spinning, Sales.138@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Proposal/RFC: new metadata-specific UUID for V5 supers, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Proposal/RFC: new metadata-specific UUID for V5 supers, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |