xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: trying to avoid a lengthy quotacheck by deleting all quota data

To: Harry Percival <harry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: trying to avoid a lengthy quotacheck by deleting all quota data
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 08:11:36 +1100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <54F98F20.9000208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <54EF1A8F.7030505@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54F856E7.10006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54F87BF3.3000405@xxxxxxxxxxx> <54F88CEC.4030009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54F89201.60805@xxxxxxxxxxx> <54F893AF.2070406@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54F895FA.4050205@xxxxxxxxxxx> <54F89B47.4010702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54F8B7D6.2000501@xxxxxxxxxxx> <54F98F20.9000208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 11:27:28AM +0000, Harry Percival wrote:
> Glad we managed to nail down a probable culprit!   Here's hoping
> Debian and Ubuntu pull in a new kernel :)
> 
> In other news, any advice on running this
> 
>     xfstests:src/bstat
> 
> command as a way of estimating how long a quotacheck will take?

It will give you an idea - quotacheck uses bulkstat, too.

> Would it still be a useful estimator?  Do you think it would
> significantly affect the performance of a disk that's under fairly
> heavy use?

Of course. Bulkstat drives the disks as hard as they will go.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>