xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

[PATCH 3/4] xfs_db: show nlink fields for di_version == 3, too

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] xfs_db: show nlink fields for di_version == 3, too
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:00:47 -0600
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <54F77199.8030708@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <54F77199.8030708@xxxxxxxxxx>
Printing inodes with di_version == 3 skips the nlink
fields, because they are only printed if di_version == 2.
This was intended to separate them from di_version == 1,
but it mistakenly excluded di_version == 3, which also contains
these fields.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

Not sure; is >= 2 ok, or should it be == 2 || == 3?
Choose your poison, I guess.

diff --git a/db/inode.c b/db/inode.c
index 982acb7..c26e1a0 100644
--- a/db/inode.c
+++ b/db/inode.c
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ inode_core_nlinkv2_count(
        ASSERT(startoff == 0);
        ASSERT(obj == iocur_top->data);
        dic = obj;
-       return dic->di_version == 2;
+       return dic->di_version >= 2;
 }
 
 static int
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ inode_core_onlink_count(
        ASSERT(startoff == 0);
        ASSERT(obj == iocur_top->data);
        dic = obj;
-       return dic->di_version == 2;
+       return dic->di_version >= 2;
 }
 
 static int
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ inode_core_projid_count(
        ASSERT(startoff == 0);
        ASSERT(obj == iocur_top->data);
        dic = obj;
-       return dic->di_version == 2;
+       return dic->di_version >= 2;
 }
 
 static int


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>