xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Documenting MS_LAZYTIME

To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Documenting MS_LAZYTIME
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:04:09 -0500
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux btrfs Developers List <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS Developers <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux API <linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=thunk.org; s=ef5046eb; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=dQoTUfr8AgFxRrZNpiaLhy5Lee2ONdtUv1z9RF4vDoI=; b=qUw4/E/6M84pt8yXqjN1H2ALRCKAWc/56Eruya1hDzjDhzbvle/WCtEGWRW/Tezb6qjCo/0/uE+2w/FVDdU6DZswbNqUqVz7gwiTV+rUVuweSUlaGNB4QUxiIHIR0hDxr+VCjcFUFMYv/WjRyWL8VNRyYVpC2KvdjuwBNcw2OFc=;
In-reply-to: <54EF2161.90607@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <CAHO5Pa0k7QkV_6BDjwTVxa7LV9tFyN9nGFFcSvOC6HYO08wfrw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54E7578E.4090809@xxxxxxxxxx> <20150221025636.GB7922@xxxxxxxxx> <54EEDE23.6080009@xxxxxxxxx> <20150226133113.GD11217@xxxxxxxxx> <54EF2161.90607@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 02:36:33PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> 
>     The disadvantage of MS_STRICTATIME | MS_LAZYTIME is that
>     in the case of a system crash, the atime and mtime fields
>     on disk might be out of date by at most 24 hours.

I'd change to "The disadvantage of MS_LAZYTIME is that..."  and
perhaps move that so it's clear it applies to any use of MS_LAZYTIME
has this as a downside.

Does that make sense?

                                                - Ted

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>