[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 19/20] xfs: implement pNFS export operations

To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/20] xfs: implement pNFS export operations
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:25:14 +1100
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20150213133811.5c3b9f49@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20150205135756.GA6386@xxxxxx> <20150206222047.GM12722@dastard> <20150206224258.GJ29783@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150208133435.GA27081@xxxxxx> <20150208090942.51e99687@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150209201154.GA27746@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150210000423.GY12722@dastard> <20150213011130.GA6808@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150213015422.GE12722@dastard> <20150213133811.5c3b9f49@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 01:38:11PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:54:22 +1100 Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Bruce. I might have to build a merged tree because one of the
> > changes from the review modified a header file introduced in the NFS
> > tree.
> > 
> > I'll see how it goes, and see if I can avoid doing something that
> > will make Linus yell at me :P
> If its a syntactic conflict with an obvious resolution, just leave it
> (or maybe mention it in the pull request).  It gives him something to
> do so he feels useful. :-)


It's not actually a conflict, though. The issue is that some of the
review comments on the XFS side resulted in changes files introduced
from the NFS tree. So the XFS side can't be merged without the NFS
changes being present....

> /me notes that I did not see a conflict while merging the xfs tree in
> linux-next today ...

Because I haven't pushed them yet ;)



Dave Chinner

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>