On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:24:15PM -0800, Chris Holcombe wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> Back in Dec 2013 you responded to this message saying that you would
> take a look at it. Was a fix for this ever issued?
Yes, it's been fixed, but that's not you problem.
> I'm seeing very
> similar stacktraces:
> INFO: task umount:29224 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> Tainted: G W 3.13.0-39-generic #66-Ubuntu
> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> umount D ffff880c4fc34480 0 29224 29221 0x00000082
> ffff880201211db0 0000000000000086 ffff880c39cb1800 ffff880201211fd8
> 0000000000014480 0000000000014480 ffff880c39cb1800 ffff880c33386480
> ffff880c395e4bc8 ffff880c333864c0 ffff880c333864e8 ffff880c33386490
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff81723109>] schedule+0x29/0x70
> [<ffffffffa023b0c9>] xfs_ail_push_all_sync+0xa9/0xe0 [xfs]
> [<ffffffff810aafd0>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0x100/0x100
> [<ffffffffa0236f13>] xfs_log_quiesce+0x33/0x70 [xfs]
> [<ffffffffa0236f62>] xfs_log_unmount+0x12/0x30 [xfs]
> [<ffffffffa01ed846>] xfs_unmountfs+0xc6/0x150 [xfs]
> [<ffffffffa01ef211>] xfs_fs_put_super+0x21/0x60 [xfs]
> [<ffffffff811bf452>] generic_shutdown_super+0x72/0xf0
> [<ffffffff811bf707>] kill_block_super+0x27/0x70
> [<ffffffff811bf9ed>] deactivate_locked_super+0x3d/0x60
> [<ffffffff811bffa6>] deactivate_super+0x46/0x60
> [<ffffffff811dcd96>] mntput_no_expire+0xd6/0x170
> [<ffffffff811de31e>] SyS_umount+0x8e/0x100
> [<ffffffff8172f7ed>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
That's XFS hung waiting for IO to complete during unmount.
> These type of errors are showing up in the logs:
> XFS (dm-8): metadata I/O error: block 0x0 ("xfs_buf_iodone_callbacks") error
> 19 numblks 1
Error 19 = ENODEV.
You pulled the drive out before you tried to unmount?
> XFS (dm-8): Detected failing async write on buffer block 0x0. Retrying async
Which means it's detecting that the write is failing, but the higher
level has been told to keep trying until all metadata has been
flushed. We probably need to tweak this slightly....
Eric - this is another case where transient vs permanent error is
somewhat squishy, and treating ENODEV as a permanent error would
solve this issue (i.e. trigger a shutdown). Did you start doing
anything in this area?
AFAICT a ENODEV error on Linux is a permanent error because if you
replug the device it will come back as a different device and the
ENODEV onteh removed device will still persist. However, I'm not
sure what dm-multipath ends up doing in this case - it's supposed to
hide the same devices coming and going, so maybe it won't trigger
this error at all...