[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 16/20] xfs: pass a 64-bit count argument to xfs_iomap_write_u

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/20] xfs: pass a 64-bit count argument to xfs_iomap_write_unwritten
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:57:56 +0100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20150202194300.GN6282@dastard>
References: <1421925006-24231-1-git-send-email-hch@xxxxxx> <1421925006-24231-17-git-send-email-hch@xxxxxx> <20150129205232.GB11064@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150202073024.GA9399@xxxxxx> <20150202192404.GI6282@dastard> <20150202194300.GN6282@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 06:43:00AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> As to the pNFSD specific changes, I haven't really looked them over
> in any great detail yet. My main concern is that there are no
> specific regression tests for this yet, I'm not sure how we go about
> verifying it actually works properly and we don't inadvertantly
> break it in the future. Christoph?

Any chance you could review them this week so we can get them
merged in time for 3.20?  In the worst case Bruce will have to pull
the xfs tree into the nfsd tree so that we have all the dependencies

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>