xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: struct xfs_sb is no longer tied to the on-disk form

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: struct xfs_sb is no longer tied to the on-disk format
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 13:37:44 -0800
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20150202193020.GJ6282@dastard>
References: <1422826983-29570-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1422826983-29570-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150202084102.GA28121@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150202193020.GJ6282@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 06:30:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > I'd expect to move it close to stuct xfs_mount, and maybe even merge
> > it into that in the long run.
> 
> I guess moving the structure there is fine, but we still want all
> the version functions to be shared with userspace, which then makes
> for an interesting set of dependencies. Any other ideas?

Are they really worth the sharing?  If they are worth it we'll
need somethign that can expect a xfs_sb/xfs_mount to be defined.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>