xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: maxpct option for small xfs filesystems

To: Alexander Tsvetkov <alexander.tsvetkov@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: maxpct option for small xfs filesystems
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 12:05:27 -0600
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <54C8BCEC.5050101@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <54C667F3.8040303@xxxxxxxxxx> <20150126223715.GA7621@dastard> <54C7BB78.4060203@xxxxxxxxxx> <54C7BD60.5000104@xxxxxxxxxxx> <54C8BCEC.5050101@xxxxxxxxxx>
On 1/28/15 4:41 AM, Alexander Tsvetkov wrote:
> What is expected behaviour in this case when it's required for fs to allocate 
> new inodes starting to exceed defined maxpct
> percentage? Which error is expected to be returned to user, enospc or 
> probably just some warning?

Sorry, I didn't answer this.  ENOSPC is expected.

There's not a lot of value in enforcing this strictly to the last inode,
because a % is fairly coarse anyway, but we should not blow right past
it as we do today.

-Eric

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>