Re: About XFS size in 32/64 bit Linux

xfs

Re: About XFS size in 32/64 bit Linux

To:	"Carlos E. R." <carlos.e.r@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: About XFS size in 32/64 bit Linux
From:	Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:24:42 +1100
Cc:	XFS mailing list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<alpine.LSU.2.11.1501082223080.5948@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<alpine.LSU.2.11.1501082223080.5948@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 10:28:52PM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm about to prepare an XFS partitioned 2TB hard disk in an external
> enclosure (USB/eSATA), using openSUSE 13.1 64 bit, but I intend to
> use it mostly under 13.1 32 bit (kernel 3.11.10)
> 
> Should I expect problems? Something to be aware of? Limits when
> using 32 bit, perhaps?

16TB max fs and file size, otherwise no differences.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
About XFS size in 32/64 bit Linux, Carlos E. R. Re: About XFS size in 32/64 bit Linux, Dave Chinner <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] xfs: inodes are new until the dentry cache is set up, Dave Chinner
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] xfs: inodes are new until the dentry cache is set up, Brian Foster
Previous by Thread:	About XFS size in 32/64 bit Linux, Carlos E. R.
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: use generic FS_IOC_GOINGDOWN for ioctl, Dave Chinner
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]