| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] xfs: truncate vs page fault IO exclusion |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 8 Jan 2015 04:24:48 -0800 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1420669543-8093-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1420669543-8093-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
> This patchset passes xfstests and various benchmarks and stress > workloads, so the real question is now: > > What have I missed? > > Comments, thoughts, flames? Why is this done in XFS and not in generic code? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] xfs: truncate vs page fault IO exclusion, Jan Kara |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 17/18] xfs: implement pnfs export operations, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] xfs: truncate vs page fault IO exclusion, Jan Kara |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] xfs: truncate vs page fault IO exclusion, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |