| To: | Hillel Lubman <shtetldik@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: What is a recommended XFS sector size for hybrid (512e) advanced format hard drives? |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 06 Jan 2015 11:02:09 -0600 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1806495.BCZcrVVEOf@shtub-cm> |
| References: | <1806495.BCZcrVVEOf@shtub-cm> |
On 1/4/15 6:56 PM, Hillel Lubman wrote:
> Hi.
> Can you please clarify what after all is the recommended sector size
> for such drives and why isn't it a default in mkfs.xfs (since
> supposedly defaults are generally recommended optimal settings unless
> you have some special use case).
It is indeed the default.
[root@sandeen ~]# blockdev --getss --getpbsz /dev/sde
512
4096
[root@sandeen ~]# mkfs.xfs /dev/sde
meta-data=/dev/sde isize=256 agcount=1, agsize=4097 blks
= sectsz=4096 attr=2, projid32bit=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=4097, imaxpct=25
= sunit=1 swidth=8 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=1424, version=2
= sectsz=4096 sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
however, some drives lie about these sizes, and then mkfs.xfs can't know.
Try the blockdev command above to see.
-Eric
|
| Previous by Date: | Update Account, update |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 14/18] nfsd: pNFS block layout driver, J. Bruce Fields |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: What is a recommended XFS sector size for hybrid (512e) advanced format hard drives?, Matthias Schniedermeyer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: What is a recommended XFS sector size for hybrid (512e) advanced format hard drives?, Chris Murphy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |