|To:||"Michael L. Semon" <mlsemon35@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: finobt option for end user|
|Date:||Sun, 21 Dec 2014 22:30:24 +0100|
|Dkim-signature:||v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3FtDM1gQ363/4YOYYB76SEWdWYv8IJoaUWZW8C68rjQ=; b=tztF9dM6vOpkJnjy20+IyzZM1rHBoFGpA3FlFXUi+zAHTXXY4HlmA1e+Dd1V65nh3u 82q8XJAHjvrvxkLMUMCU0IG5iIXQpE6LVEu9MfX9MWbLlS113sWC86WQw4Z0kGdp2Wgd jAeTmueOEPps7C3vOlQZrhCEQ6A9UKWRGVFA0j6XoNMeMRhL58qg/2M/r3ikjAvuYifw PAAyrHptlIdmfgTfYA+2UuzVild0Hi+06z3EfvYIIZgBTpIdKaXTzkcj+yqX1D2umPli nfZYM3Gg/4Ax1PELHVzeUUniFVb+J4ugc4t0ybQpyJZyPKUj36VdryQ9oO9QvUeT9Tu2 JdzQ==|
Thanks for the detailed answer.
Regarding your last comment on mounting my volume read-only it might not be possible since I update the metadatas of my pictures quite often and thus even on older pictures. Part of my backup strategy, besides my unRAID NAS, that BTW has recently officially switched from ReiserFS to XFS, is a dedicated drive storing backup created by "bup" with the optional PAR2 checksum activated so I get incrementa and de-duplicated backup as well as protection against bit-rot.
PS: I was so excited about the new XFS metadata checksum that I went ahead and added a section about it to the ArchLinux official wiki. Now I'm trying to figure out if the finobt bit should be added as well under the performance section.
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Michael L. Semon <mlsemon35@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|