xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH-v4 1/7] vfs: split update_time() into update_time() and write

To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v4 1/7] vfs: split update_time() into update_time() and write_time()
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:23:28 -0800
Cc: Linux Filesystem Development List <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux btrfs Developers List <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS Developers <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1416997437-26092-2-git-send-email-tytso@xxxxxxx>
References: <1416997437-26092-1-git-send-email-tytso@xxxxxxx> <1416997437-26092-2-git-send-email-tytso@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
As mentioned last round please move the addition of the is_readonly
operation to the first thing in the series, so that the ordering makes
more sense.

Second I think this patch is incorrect for XFS - XFS uses ->update_time
to set the time stampst in the dinode.  These two need to be coherent
as we can write out a dirty inode any time, so it needs to have the
timestamp uptodate.

Third update_time now calls mark_inode_dirty unconditionally, while
previously it wasn't called when ->update_time was set.  At least
for XFS that's a major change in behavior as XFS never used VFS dirty
tracking for metadata updates.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>