[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH-v2 0/5] add support for a lazytime mount option

To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v2 0/5] add support for a lazytime mount option
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 01:07:55 -0800
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1416675267-2191-1-git-send-email-tytso@xxxxxxx>
References: <1416675267-2191-1-git-send-email-tytso@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
What's the test coverage for this?  xfstest generic/192 tests that
atime is persisted over remounts, which we had a bug with when XFS
used to have a lazy atime implementation somewhat similar to the

We should have something similar for c/mtime as well.  Also a test to
ensure timestamps are persisted afer a fsync, although right now I can't
imagine how to do that genericly as no other filesystem seems to have
an equivaent to XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN.

It seems you also handle i_version updates lazily. although that's
not mentioned anywhere.  I actually have a clarification request out on
the IETF NFSv4 list about the persistance requirements for the change
counter but I've not seen an answer to it yet.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>