xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

[PATCH] xfs/068: fix expected output file for proper restore output

To: fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] xfs/068: fix expected output file for proper restore output
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:58:42 -0500
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Oh my, I did a very bad thing - I wrote a new test to
check for xfsdump regressions, but did not create the
.out file with a known-good kernel.

This matches output from older, stable kernels, and is the
proper expected output.  Sorry about that!

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

diff --git a/tests/xfs/068.out b/tests/xfs/068.out
index c270c66..2196eee 100644
--- a/tests/xfs/068.out
+++ b/tests/xfs/068.out
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ xfsrestore: session id: ID
 xfsrestore: media ID: ID
 xfsrestore: searching media for directory dump
 xfsrestore: reading directories
-xfsrestore: 486 directories and 1590 entries processed
+xfsrestore: 495 directories and 1593 entries processed
 xfsrestore: directory post-processing
 xfsrestore: restoring non-directory files
 xfsrestore: restore complete: SECS seconds elapsed

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [PATCH] xfs/068: fix expected output file for proper restore output, Eric Sandeen <=