[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs_vn_rename by xfs_vn_rename2

To: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs_vn_rename by xfs_vn_rename2
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 02:35:56 -0700
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20141016210457.GA33732@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1413397042-32229-1-git-send-email-cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> <1413397042-32229-2-git-send-email-cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> <20141016210457.GA33732@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 05:04:57PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> The function rename seems unnecessary..? Meh, not a big deal to me
> either way. Otherwise, this one seems Ok.

Yeah, we might as well keep the old name.  As far as I'm concerned
I'd love to get rid of the two different IOPS in the VFS, too.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>