| To: | Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs_vn_rename by xfs_vn_rename2 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Oct 2014 02:35:56 -0700 |
| Cc: | Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20141016210457.GA33732@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1413397042-32229-1-git-send-email-cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> <1413397042-32229-2-git-send-email-cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> <20141016210457.GA33732@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 05:04:57PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > The function rename seems unnecessary..? Meh, not a big deal to me > either way. Otherwise, this one seems Ok. Yeah, we might as well keep the old name. As far as I'm concerned I'd love to get rid of the two different IOPS in the VFS, too. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | splice read/write pipe lock ordering issues (was Re: XFS lockdep with Linux v3.17-5503-g35a9ad8af0bb), Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: splice read/write pipe lock ordering issues (was Re: XFS lockdep with Linux v3.17-5503-g35a9ad8af0bb), Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs_vn_rename by xfs_vn_rename2, Brian Foster |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs_vn_rename by xfs_vn_rename2, Carlos Maiolino |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |