xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Question about services

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Question about services
From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 14:42:34 -0300
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <54341B23.8010708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <7e633ff6302413da933e04671cd98cdc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20141006175243.GA4680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54331346.7050005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20141007005826.GA30678@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5433B1A1.90500@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <54341B23.8010708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:56:03PM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
> On 10/07/2014 05:25 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> >On 2014-10-07 02:58, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> >>Whatever, this got me, well written scam :)
> >Absolutely :-)
> >It fooled my spamassassin.
> >
> 
> Well, your spam filter was at a disadvantage here because the message came
> to you via the XFS mailing list, not directly from the spammer. By passing
> along the spam, the mailing list is adding some legitimacy to the message in
> the eyes of most spam filters.
> 
> Speaking of spam, when are we going to move to a mailing list infrastructure
> that has functional spam filtering (and doesn't repost DSNs)?
> 
See my last thread regarding it. :)

> [grumpy cat image goes here]
> 
> n
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

-- 
Carlos

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>