On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:56:03PM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
> On 10/07/2014 05:25 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> >On 2014-10-07 02:58, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> >>Whatever, this got me, well written scam :)
> >Absolutely :-)
> >It fooled my spamassassin.
> Well, your spam filter was at a disadvantage here because the message came
> to you via the XFS mailing list, not directly from the spammer. By passing
> along the spam, the mailing list is adding some legitimacy to the message in
> the eyes of most spam filters.
> Speaking of spam, when are we going to move to a mailing list infrastructure
> that has functional spam filtering (and doesn't repost DSNs)?
See my last thread regarding it. :)
> [grumpy cat image goes here]
> xfs mailing list