xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Question about services

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Question about services
From: "Nathaniel W. Turner" <nate@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 12:56:03 -0400
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5433B1A1.90500@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <7e633ff6302413da933e04671cd98cdc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20141006175243.GA4680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54331346.7050005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20141007005826.GA30678@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5433B1A1.90500@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
On 10/07/2014 05:25 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2014-10-07 02:58, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
Whatever, this got me, well written scam :)
Absolutely :-)
It fooled my spamassassin.


Well, your spam filter was at a disadvantage here because the message came to you via the XFS mailing list, not directly from the spammer. By passing along the spam, the mailing list is adding some legitimacy to the message in the eyes of most spam filters.

Speaking of spam, when are we going to move to a mailing list infrastructure that has functional spam filtering (and doesn't repost DSNs)?

[grumpy cat image goes here]

n

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>