| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 14/16] xfs: rename XFS_IOC_FSGEOM to XFS_IOC_FSGEOM_V2 |
| From: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 6 Oct 2014 15:38:59 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, olaf@xxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20141006203300.GC2301@dastard> |
| References: | <20141003214758.GY1865@xxxxxxx> <20141003220435.GN1865@xxxxxxx> <20141006203300.GC2301@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:33:00AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 05:04:35PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> > > > > We'll be creating a new versioned XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY ioctl and structure > > so rename the current revision to _V2. > > Urk, no. > > This will result in older applications picking up the new ioctl when > they are rebuilt without having explicit support for the new ioctl. > > Just create a new ioctl with a new name and modify applications to > use it. If the kernel does not support the new ioctl, then fall back > to the old one in userspace. D'oh. Yeah, ok. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 14/16] xfs: rename XFS_IOC_FSGEOM to XFS_IOC_FSGEOM_V2, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 15/16] xfs: xfs_fs_geometry returns a number of bytes to copy, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 14/16] xfs: rename XFS_IOC_FSGEOM to XFS_IOC_FSGEOM_V2, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 15/16] xfs: xfs_fs_geometry returns a number of bytes to copy, Ben Myers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |