[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Why not move xfs infra-structure to "public" services

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Why not move xfs infra-structure to "public" services
From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:12:45 -0300
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20140930200046.GQ4758@dastard>
Mail-followup-to: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20140930141857.GA2053@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140930200046.GQ4758@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Thanks dave.

Can I use your kernel.org tree from now then?

Regarding the mailing list, let me know if you need some help

On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 06:00:46AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:18:57AM -0300, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > 
> > I'm sorry for this kind of "fancy" question from my side, but I'm wondering 
> > why
> > xfs project infra-structure (mailing list, git trees), does not use the 
> > "usual
> > public" services. I mean, does anyone thought about moving xfs mailing list 
> > to
> > vger.kernel.org, and the git trees to git.kernel.org?
> I'm already using git.kernel.org for my master XFS trees. The ones
> on oss.sgi.com are simply now downstream mirrors. There's still a
> few things I need to organise (e.g. where release tarballs are put)
> before we make the kernel.org trees the official source of XFS
> source code.
> We already have a linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailing list - we just
> don't use it. Again, more organisation stuff to do to switch over
> (i.e. forwarding from xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx to the vger list) and then
> updating documentation everywhere and getting people to start using
> it.
> Cheers,
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>