[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC v2] Unicode/UTF-8 support for XFS

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] Unicode/UTF-8 support for XFS
From: Jeremy Allison <jra@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:04:07 -0700
Cc: Olaf Weber <olaf@xxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tinguely@xxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20140926165605.GA25274@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20140918195650.GI19952@xxxxxxx> <20140922222611.GZ4322@dastard> <5422C540.1060007@xxxxxxx> <20140924231024.GA4758@dastard> <54257D3F.70302@xxxxxxx> <20140926165605.GA25274@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Jeremy Allison <jra@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 09:56:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> My take on this is:
>  - I think we'll have to prevent non-utf8 file names for any cases where
>    we use utf8 normalization.  If you do not use utf8 normalization
>    it's plain old Unix everything is allowed.
>  - I think utf8 normalization vs not should be mkfs option, to make sure
>    everyone including kernel and repair knows what sort of filesystem
>    deal with.
>  - case insensitive matching for utf8 normalized filesystems should be
>    a runtime decision.  mount time for now, but Samba people would be
>    extremly happy to allow per-operation or per-process CI matching.
>    But that is another totally different discusion I'd like to keep
>    separate, I just want to make sure the disk format allows for it for
>    now.

Actually, I'm so eager for case-insensitive matching I'd
take "at format time", as with ZFS :-) :-).

Having CI matching can speed up Samba operations by a
factor of 10 on large directories (warning, number made
up, depending on the number of entries per dir :-).


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>