[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Corrupted files

To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Corrupted files
From: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:24:04 -0400
Cc: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sean Caron <scaron@xxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oQFXPUL5DZREmYDysv7l/4YAc9RBwdKaUQauG+KwLfk=; b=e9601iuexuBjoKqc86Ht6MDAxH2vFkd9ue1riw5HibgIq/VZMSHyLIoBYX5gCIhoMn xGMbpbv+O8sXyuG4DcLiuiG8/qtL8dLss3+UJYVBUrl9gHx6rpwhbh/mv92HcZanBNa1 lAPRmIzHS+ljDVRpFOuPAVR1gwJo/4wDaXZT3pTWFVGRnmzDwfmqWfWucgekYtX7cYra hy948bXbbXwKtCdGKp/mBplo3Ki/PDazxOZGgmuCJkoJ4f8MyUkwhnU+Sc04Cyf6ZHGT PQnx1rjdCRqogu9iF/4OuABd1wqSIlfUcdLPNQsGNp+OhlOzrs8OywT/IVZadqcZwpLr LrZQ==
In-reply-to: <20140910163124.3d879432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <540F1B01.3020700@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140909220645.GH20518@dastard> <540FA586.9090308@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAA43vkVYX+zJQcoTH2iSX7rS9B1D=mnTeyS0QqP+fbKxVY0YZA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <540FACAC.3010504@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140910163124.3d879432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Emmanuel Florac
<eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le Tue, 09 Sep 2014 20:43:08 -0500
> Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Ãcrivait:
>>       None of the failed drives were WD green.  All three and the
>> previous four were Seagate.  I realize that is not a large
>> statistical sample.
> If you're interested in large statistical samples, on a grand total of
> 4000 1 TB Seagate Barracuda ES2, I had to replace 2100 of them over the
> course of 3 years. I still have a couple of hundred of these
> unfortunate pieces of crap in service, and they still represent the
> vast majority of unexpected RAID malfunctions, urgent replacements,
> late night calls and other "interesting side activities".
> I wouldn't buy anything labeled Seagate nowadays. Their drives have
> been the baddest train wreck since the dreaded 9 GB Micropolis back in
> 1994 (or was it 1995?).

I buy about 100 drives a year, but I don't work them very hard.  Just
lots of data to store and I need to keep my data sets segregated for
legal reasons.  I don't use raid, just lots of individual disks and
most data maintained redundantly.

About 4 years ago (or maybe 5), Seagate had a catastrophic drive
situation.  I can remember buying a batch of 10 drives and having 8 of
them fail in the first 2 months.  The bad part was they mostly
survived a 10 hour burn-in, so they tended to fail with real data on
them.   I had one case (at a minimum) that summer where I put the data
on 3 different Seagate drives and all 3 failed.

Fortunately, I was able to swap the disk controller card from one of
the working drives with one of the dead drives and recover the data.

Regardless, ignoring the summer of discontent, I find Seagate to be my
preferred drives.

fyi: In June I bought 30 or so WD elements drives to try them out.
These are not the green drives, just bare bones WD drives.  None of
them were DOA, but 3 failed within 4 weeks, so a 10% failure rate in
the first month.  Only one of them had unique data on it, so I had to
recreate that data.  Fortunately the source of the data was still
available.  All of those drives have been pulled out of routine


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>