[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Corrupted files

To: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Corrupted files
From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:31:24 +0200
Cc: Sean Caron <scaron@xxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <540FACAC.3010504@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Intellique
References: <540F1B01.3020700@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140909220645.GH20518@dastard> <540FA586.9090308@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAA43vkVYX+zJQcoTH2iSX7rS9B1D=mnTeyS0QqP+fbKxVY0YZA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <540FACAC.3010504@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Le Tue, 09 Sep 2014 20:43:08 -0500
Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Ãcrivait:

>       None of the failed drives were WD green.  All three and the
> previous four were Seagate.  I realize that is not a large
> statistical sample.

If you're interested in large statistical samples, on a grand total of
4000 1 TB Seagate Barracuda ES2, I had to replace 2100 of them over the
course of 3 years. I still have a couple of hundred of these
unfortunate pieces of crap in service, and they still represent the
vast majority of unexpected RAID malfunctions, urgent replacements,
late night calls and other "interesting side activities".

I wouldn't buy anything labeled Seagate nowadays. Their drives have
been the baddest train wreck since the dreaded 9 GB Micropolis back in
1994 (or was it 1995?).

Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |   <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>