xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Is XFS suitable for 350 million files on 20TB storage?

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is XFS suitable for 350 million files on 20TB storage?
From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 11:49:20 +0200
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20140908094659.GC30012@dastard>
References: <540986B1.4080306@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140905123058.GA29710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5409AF40.10801@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140905230528.GO20473@dastard> <540AB933.4030707@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140906150412.GB23506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140906225654.GB9955@dastard> <540D6A6C.9090801@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140908094659.GC30012@dastard>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
Am 08.09.2014 um 11:46 schrieb Dave Chinner:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:35:56AM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> Thanks,
>>
>> upgraded to 3.16.2 and xfsprogs 3.2.1. Let's see how it behaves with finobt.
> 
> You need to mkfs the filesystem to use finobt - it's not something
> that an upgrade will just switch on. i.e.
> 
> # mkfs.xfs -m crc=1,finobt=1 <dev>

Sure i also did a reformat using "-m crc=1,finobt=1".

Stefan

> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>