xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mount options question

To: Xfs <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mount options question
From: Stefan Ring <stefanrin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 14:15:03 +0200
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=6JCnedpCbsKucT31UmMHXCBUP9ZpxDVL9C2lLdYL1Jw=; b=HCp9D5vUtLOkdRs/eerHQfVkPbszgvPegJ5wzoBIKUT4ANqjd1jWXIRYaKDeRogqHr pSIo3M6sMyRZBXmzgEiptqgfH0oja4GR2UXcOEcFV1vOmrdwtWasSYLSvUNR3RQBPNFN 3kW5+czNyM95FhbahxgI9/I4KxbJE3RX+lBt9xjmoUxBAUUoCjqVZnL1NM07GKPdD/O2 ieX+s6Yh8D3QuB6fRix6paNt/AWz/OojgS3sK0i1sglkkBGvUXrPGusBQaBTc6WkPOuk qzePnFMCHVkTSU0ztcf9uGFVV+fESV86l6KRzqzIPekkOu/TMm35bdv+qT5Ny2fFVx0H VULQ==
In-reply-to: <20140829083738.GD20518@dastard>
References: <3dc9caf6f9b415f6e4c0ebac1f1626d3@xxxxxxxxxx> <20140827230732.GN20518@dastard> <CAAxjCEy9UyjDVrTZ4GdRyDy330wUqLGWurzrLAE6-7Q0KdYzvA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140829083738.GD20518@dastard>
>> Mostly agreed, but using "discard" would be a no-brainer for me. I
>> suppose XFS does not automatically switch it on for non-rotational
>> storage.
>
> Yup, you're not using your brain. :P
>
> mount -o discard *sucks* on so many levels it is not funny. I don't
> recommend that anybody *ever* use it, on XFS, ext4 or btrfs.  Just
> use fstrim if you ever need to clean up a SSD.

Good to know, thanks!

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: mount options question, Stefan Ring <=