xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mount options question

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mount options question
From: Stefan Ring <stefanrin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:31:43 +0200
Cc: weber@xxxxxxxxxx, Xfs <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2nPnr4Lc3CfvX/PPhO2BNqC1shQJo9R4pZrWNvd0LMg=; b=jaqHV7aYayPx9GaE+fdfSNBRxc4AjXeYoMR/LvyELTtLlwD2wuwTugUnun06dm7Bpd PK2j7l5+/6L2z4Eh369omKR/giNrA2D0JzubGrl34ITokSFXIMorJqpk+SAKajAYhsiR KlNnhJYsCJ7nRK4wyj3nW/T/8yNbaVZCxZ55Wfxo4BjbLcRV+0CAdzblE57omJyNU6Y0 MW1y6zLPVlB9LadjjD3j8T10CHPW7Maa0Urhilmjlxfi74/PfdDDoeNolEPxEGohxsS3 9aRQiX5CtuQbkaPiXxov3kzWiZQ8LYRzlAmxS7+43tYmGYWklc/LSPfK4n46BieXpnQz QkcQ==
In-reply-to: <20140827230732.GN20518@dastard>
References: <3dc9caf6f9b415f6e4c0ebac1f1626d3@xxxxxxxxxx> <20140827230732.GN20518@dastard>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:14:21PM +0200, Marko Weber|8000 wrote:
>>
>> sorry dave and all other,
>>
>> can you guys recommend me the most stable / best mount options for
>> my new server with ssdÂs and XFS filesystem?
>>
>> at moment i would set:  defaults,nobarrier,discard,logbsize=256k,noikeep
>> or is just "default" the best solution and xfs detect itself whats best.
>>
>> can you guide me a bit?
>>
>> as eleavtor i set elevator=noop
>>
>> i setup disks with linux softraid raid1. On top of the raid is LVM
>> (for some data partations).
>>
>>
>> would be nice to hear some tipps from you
>
> Unless you have specific requirements or have the knowledge to
> understand how the different options affect behaviour, then just use
> the defaults.

Mostly agreed, but using "discard" would be a no-brainer for me. I
suppose XFS does not automatically switch it on for non-rotational
storage.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>