| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | bad performance on touch/cp file on XFS system |
| From: | Zhang Qiang <zhangqiang.buaa@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Aug 2014 11:34:34 +0800 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UXQhJiTAdPTaUQ4pPyzfgPurjiHVFk1SSN9GEAmUsM8=; b=wpK/geFwaVD9FNBq7/7NfbBWDaVtAZk7u/HB4Qd3aHaHJ4ESMMOUsoBjqifRdW51UX G9D8FD8aEjLTq5mHx5RqV4fWuZo//rVVXRuf6qEYtWUgpE8UD2NANqq9E4KEf+vPiDFC 8h9gJ8QvBp98AjVEyP05VdqZUam70ItltdLYNEwifBU2SkWSvKSDdSnvFTkRoQ4TTS2H RDBEirLZykSMP+S+vInZl+BP+J51NdvNMs0XS1UM2wNe78ZG4chy7AllHyDoQpvNIuTx vxYGxIuoinj20PW+rqOiCLDB483rMkKdoF0Kc4b739Tqzo8kW/RRYqOqAbtXIsw6V8nd qZYA== |
|
Dear XFS community & developers, I am using CentOS 6.3 and xfs as base file system and use RAID5 as hardware storage. Detail environment as follow:
 ÂOS: CentOS 6.3  ÂKernel: kernel-2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64  ÂXFS option info(df output): /dev/sdb1 on /data type xfs (rw,noatime,nodiratime,nobarrier) Detail phenomenon:
 Â   # df   Filesystem      ÂSize ÂUsed Avail Use% Mounted on   /dev/sda1       Â29G  17G  11G Â61% /   /dev/sdb1       893G Â803G  91G Â90% /data
  /dev/sda4       2.2T Â1.6T Â564G Â75% /data1  Â   # time touch /data1/1111   real  Â0m23.043s   user  Â0m0.001s   sys   0m0.349s  ÂÂ
  # perf top   Events: 6K cycles   Â16.96% Â[xfs]           [k] xfs_inobt_get_rec   Â11.95% Â[xfs]           [k] xfs_btree_increment   Â11.16% Â[xfs]           [k] xfs_btree_get_rec
   7.39% Â[xfs]           [k] xfs_btree_get_block    5.02% Â[xfs]           [k] xfs_dialloc    4.87% Â[xfs]           [k] xfs_btree_rec_offset    4.33% Â[xfs]           [k] xfs_btree_readahead
   4.13% Â[xfs]           [k] _xfs_buf_find    4.05% Â[kernel]         Â[k] intel_idle    2.89% Â[xfs]           [k] xfs_btree_rec_addr    1.04% Â[kernel]         Â[k] kmem_cache_free
It seems that some xfs kernel function spend much time (xfs_inobt_get_rec, xfs_btree_increment, etc.) I found a bug in bugzilla [1], is that is the same issue like this?
It's very greatly appreciated if you can give constructive suggestion about this issue, as It's really hard to reproduce from another system and it's not possible to do upgrade on that online machine.
Thanks in advance
Qiang |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Eres un Buen Gerente?, Administracion |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bad performance on touch/cp file on XFS system, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Eres un Buen Gerente?, Administracion |
| Next by Thread: | Re: bad performance on touch/cp file on XFS system, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |