xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: inode64 directory placement determinism

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: inode64 directory placement determinism
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 21:15:39 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <53FA47B4.6020103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <e1eeba7b0fb97c63e41f40ed9ac162d7@localhost> <20140818070153.GL20518@dastard> <bc34a576d2b3e8c431633574deaa37cc@localhost> <20140818224853.GD26465@dastard> <ed7598d015f5a1d3576e6b03f3ef3116@localhost> <53FA47B4.6020103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
On 8/24/2014 3:14 PM, stan hoeppner wrote:

> Due to the timetable and other restrictions I wouldn't be able to use
> patches that might come from fleshing out our ideas here, but I think it
> would be very useful functionality for others.

Let me restate the above as I don't "think" we'd be able to use patches
in the short term for version 1 of the product.  That may change if said
hypothetical patches might become available within the next 3 weeks,
which is probably highly unlikely.  They brought me in very late in the
game, unfortunately, so I'm racing against the clock.  And of course I
wasn't able to assist in architectural planning, and make such a feature
request here long ago, allowing for sufficient lead time.


Stan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>