| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: inode64 directory placement determinism |
| From: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 24 Aug 2014 21:15:39 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <53FA47B4.6020103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <e1eeba7b0fb97c63e41f40ed9ac162d7@localhost> <20140818070153.GL20518@dastard> <bc34a576d2b3e8c431633574deaa37cc@localhost> <20140818224853.GD26465@dastard> <ed7598d015f5a1d3576e6b03f3ef3116@localhost> <53FA47B4.6020103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 |
On 8/24/2014 3:14 PM, stan hoeppner wrote: > Due to the timetable and other restrictions I wouldn't be able to use > patches that might come from fleshing out our ideas here, but I think it > would be very useful functionality for others. Let me restate the above as I don't "think" we'd be able to use patches in the short term for version 1 of the product. That may change if said hypothetical patches might become available within the next 3 weeks, which is probably highly unlikely. They brought me in very late in the game, unfortunately, so I'm racing against the clock. And of course I wasn't able to assist in architectural planning, and make such a feature request here long ago, allowing for sufficient lead time. Stan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: inode64 directory placement determinism, stan hoeppner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: inode64 directory placement determinism, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: inode64 directory placement determinism, stan hoeppner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: inode64 directory placement determinism, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |