xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Verifier fixes backported to stable kernels?

To: Fanael Linithien <fanael4@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Verifier fixes backported to stable kernels?
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:16:29 +1000
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20140811043219.GJ26465@dastard>
References: <CA+o=1OVY0pV18XMKz98dT5LGwE500DQQb5B1wh=HaGTAGuP+oQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140809005404.GG26465@dastard> <CA+o=1OX+Qq4Scq=su1MDDknRXJGL8F=7WV8P0PCeDjYep7rLnA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CA+o=1OXmM+WsFh-ipS4d8hn6RKvOuv3Zga+66PF4DBehuH-5-A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140811043219.GJ26465@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 02:32:19PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 05:55:19PM +0200, Fanael Linithien wrote:
> > 2014-08-09 2:54 GMT+02:00 Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > What fixes are you talking about? List of commits, please, noting
> > > whether the commit already has a "cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" in
> > > it or not.
> > 
> > These are the commits:
> > 
> > 400b9d88757c0bfbdfa97014e090ec40a31c1282
> > 67dc288c21064b31a98a53dc64f6b9714b819fd6 (this is the only one with the cc)
> > 5fd364fee81a7888af806e42ed8a91c845894f2d
> > ad3714b82c631a34724da09a7daa53afcab952fa
> 
> Ok, but please use the "one-line format" when quoting commits.
> 
> I.e. this:
> 
> $ git log --oneline -n 4 ad3714b
> ad3714b xfs: dquot recovery needs verifiers
> 5fd364f xfs: quotacheck leaves dquot buffers without verifiers
> 67dc288 xfs: ensure verifiers are attached to recovered buffers
> 400b9d8 xfs: catch buffers written without verifiers attached

Actually, I'm not going to send this last patch back to older,
stable kernels. I really don't want to have to port random patches
back to older kernels to avoid it generating false positives.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>