[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Verifier fixes backported to stable kernels?

To: Fanael Linithien <fanael4@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Verifier fixes backported to stable kernels?
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 11:58:42 -0700
Cc: "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CA+o=1OXmM+WsFh-ipS4d8hn6RKvOuv3Zga+66PF4DBehuH-5-A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CA+o=1OVY0pV18XMKz98dT5LGwE500DQQb5B1wh=HaGTAGuP+oQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140809005404.GG26465@dastard> <CA+o=1OX+Qq4Scq=su1MDDknRXJGL8F=7WV8P0PCeDjYep7rLnA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CA+o=1OXmM+WsFh-ipS4d8hn6RKvOuv3Zga+66PF4DBehuH-5-A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Aug 9, 2014, at 8:55 AM, Fanael Linithien <fanael4@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2014-08-09 2:54 GMT+02:00 Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> What fixes are you talking about? List of commits, please, noting
>> whether the commit already has a "cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" in
>> it or not.
> These are the commits:
> 400b9d88757c0bfbdfa97014e090ec40a31c1282
> 67dc288c21064b31a98a53dc64f6b9714b819fd6 (this is the only one with the cc)
> 5fd364fee81a7888af806e42ed8a91c845894f2d
> ad3714b82c631a34724da09a7daa53afcab952fa
>> Patch your kernel with the fixes you've identified are necessary,
>> then - it can take some time for fixes to propagate through the
>> stable process....
> This is what I'm trying to avoid, out of sheer laziness. I suppose I'm
> going to have to do that if I want to have a working linux, though.
In what way did this "eat" your root fs?  What happened?  Also, are you using a 
CRC-enabled filesystem?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>