xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Verifier fixes backported to stable kernels?

Subject: Re: Verifier fixes backported to stable kernels?
From: Fanael Linithien <fanael4@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 17:55:19 +0200
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=9X5LfzKbwmg/+XhmsEBL0M8GeEgHYjPkTSLr5FTQ5RU=; b=PXrlUf57DqzcmgfdUrojKrep/vCVy7uvG7eCFJrCrAAaTm33UcnAz8p97MuGAoracZ pojpC9mdY4ftb45Dyb7fsJ4+9dwaCUsl3RVeqqFlMY+1wDZ+eIyXeOePpFpEmhoymD4I IdvEQ+/caBAHTk7CTm4ZepnVRXwVIvSybukdnyPjMyvsSi9LgZrJ/5bKtRIxQU03VWW7 7LGfzqC08josnvgbSKl259XhBRCENgiNDLQ/m0lbUBMQTbkmaenT0o0XarOp/AG8jy7q 5cKnIECupHQRnBoMAYMguU9fjQDU0aI0/R8BzbQ/x9itMQ4qSw9aDTeqf4+ohpcH1Z5R DPeQ==
In-reply-to: <CA+o=1OX+Qq4Scq=su1MDDknRXJGL8F=7WV8P0PCeDjYep7rLnA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CA+o=1OVY0pV18XMKz98dT5LGwE500DQQb5B1wh=HaGTAGuP+oQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140809005404.GG26465@dastard> <CA+o=1OX+Qq4Scq=su1MDDknRXJGL8F=7WV8P0PCeDjYep7rLnA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2014-08-09 2:54 GMT+02:00 Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> What fixes are you talking about? List of commits, please, noting
> whether the commit already has a "cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" in
> it or not.

These are the commits:

400b9d88757c0bfbdfa97014e090ec40a31c1282
67dc288c21064b31a98a53dc64f6b9714b819fd6 (this is the only one with the cc)
5fd364fee81a7888af806e42ed8a91c845894f2d
ad3714b82c631a34724da09a7daa53afcab952fa

> Patch your kernel with the fixes you've identified are necessary,
> then - it can take some time for fixes to propagate through the
> stable process....

This is what I'm trying to avoid, out of sheer laziness. I suppose I'm
going to have to do that if I want to have a working linux, though.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>