| To: | Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: don't zero partial page cache pages during O_DIRECT |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 08 Aug 2014 22:19:10 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <53E5885A.9090302@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <53E4E03A.7050101@xxxxxx> <20140809003628.GE26465@dastard> <53E5885A.9090302@xxxxxx> |
On 8/8/14, 9:32 PM, Chris Mason wrote: >> Go on, call me a deranged monkey on some serious mind-controlling >> substances. I don't care. :) Insider / obscure quote achievement unlocked! > The deranged part is invalidating pos -> -1 on a huge file because of a > single 512b direct read. But, if you mix O_DIRECT and buffered you get > what the monkeys give you and like it. Agreed, I really scratch my head at that one... -Eric |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH RFC] xfs: use invalidate_inode_pages2_range for DIO writes, Chris Mason |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: don't zero partial page cache pages during O_DIRECT, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: don't zero partial page cache pages during O_DIRECT, Chris Mason |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: don't zero partial page cache pages during O_DIRECT, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |