| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Is jdm_delete_filehandle part of a public API? |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:46:55 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <53D7DA7F.2040706@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <53D7DA7F.2040706@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:31:43PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > I was cleaning up xfsprogs to plug some leaks, and wanted to use > jdm_delete_filehandle(). I noticed that it has an "hlen" argument which > is unused. > > Can we remove that, or is this part of a public API? It's not in any > manpage (or even called anywhere in xfsprogs/xfstests/xfsdump/dmapi) > but it is in a public header... Which means it is part of the published API, regardless of whether it is documented in the man page or not. As it is, we've never really cared about ABI stability for these libraries - I don't think we've ever guaranteed stability in any way. If you want to change it, though, I suspect we'll need to bump the library version.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Delaylog information enquiry, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | I need your trust and devotion, Mrs. Patricia Robert |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Is jdm_delete_filehandle part of a public API?, Mark Tinguely |
| Next by Thread: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, xfs-quota-eofblocks-scan, created. xfs-for-linus-3.16-rc1-13111-gf074051, xfs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |